Summer vacation can be fun except sometimes at the swimming pools. This letter relates some events from the summer of 1997; the transcription is below each page.
1.
July 31 / 97
Dear Charlin',
I am having
a nice vacation. Are you? As I
said before in my other letter what is
your telephone number. I will be
happy to hear from you.
I got this stationery
for Christmas and it is the first time
I used it. Did you have any exciti
ng experiences this summer. Please
don't mind the hand writing it is
page 2 of 4 |
2
about twelve - thirty in the morning
I went swimming up
North Attleboro Pool once this summer.
The deepest end is 11 feet. But there
are ropes to separate the diving and the
swimming. In the /t/h/e swimming
part the water is 5 feet at the highest
place. And as I said before the highest
in the diving section is 11 feet.
You can't go past the
ropes to swim if you do you will
be put out.
And today I went swim-
ming up East Side Pool. There (Ther) aren't
any ropes in this pool because the
deepest end is about five feet. There
isn't and diving at East Side
Pool.
page 3 of 4 |
3.
The boys up there are fresh.
They dunk you, and dunk, you and
splash you, and chase you. You really
have a hard time swimming or trying
to swim. Well I hope you have a
vacation, as I hope the last of your vaca-
tion is nice. Because you have less
than two months to enjoy yourself.
Well please write soon!
Love
Katherine
Gareau C//
P.S.
As I said before
please excuse the
hand writing.
C//
----------
The two public swimming pools that are mentioned in the letter are located in North Attleboro, Massachusetts and on the East Side in Providence, Rhode Island.
The letter paper shows the effects of time and oxidation.
This letter, from 1997, was found inside the Spring 1954 edition of Reader's Digest Condensed Books. The front cover of that edition flourishes a floral leafy pattern:
The volume contains: "The Night of the Hunter", "God and My Country", "Not as a Stranger", "The Best Cartoons from France", and "The Young Elizabeth".
You would think that a 1997 letter would have been tucked into a newer book? Not one from 1954?
ReplyDeleteGood point! That book was 43 years old when the letter was written.
ReplyDelete